Sex

Male

Parish

St John, Chester

Marital Status

Unknown

Causes

EDC 5/10/1 – defendant

Sex

Female

Parish

Coddington

Marital Status

Unknown

Remarks

There were a number of families with the surname ‘Brereton’ in Cheshire at this time, but there is no evidence to link Jane Brereton with any specific family.

Causes

EDC 5/5/1 – defendant

Sex

Female

Parish

Ormskirk

Marital Status

At Issue

Causes

EDC 5/7/1– defendant

Sex

Male

Parish

Eccles

Marital Status

Unknown

Causes

EDC 5/2/1 – defendant

Sex

Male

Marital Status

Married

Spouse Name

Jane or Joan

Occupation Status

Knight

Remarks

Sir Richard Brereton was the second son of Sir Randle Brereton of Malpas and older brother of the courtier, William Brereton, and the pluralist cleric and royal chaplain, John Brereton.

He married Jane or Joan, daughter and heiress of William Stanley of Tatton. She was also great-niece of Thomas Stanley, 1^st earl of Derby. Sir Richard was her second husband. Jane Stanley inherited the Manor of Worsley in the parish of Eccles in Lancashire. She was born about 1493, as she was 18 on the death of her mother in 1511.

In 1542 Lady Brereton sued her husband in the Chester Consistory Court for divorce (which would have meant separation from bed and board). Some depositions in this matter have survived (CCALS EDC 2/2 ff. 448-449, 545v). The deponents all cited a number of extra-marital relationships on the part of Richard Brereton which had resulted in several illegitimate children, some of whom he acknowledged and some he did not. It was said to be widely known that one of his mistresses had suffered from ‘the french pokkes’, a common name for syphilis. Two deponents specifically mentioned this illness so there may have been reference to it in the libel.

He had three legitimate children, the eldest, Richard, was accused by his father of taking a chalice from the chapel in his manor of Worsley, among other criminal deeds. Richard predeceased his father.

Sir Richard Brereton died in 1557 in Islington, then in Middlesex.

His will, made in 1553, acknowledged four illegitimate sons and two daughters, leaving legacies to each of them. His will was disputed by his widow and his surviving legitimate son, Geoffrey, but was held to be valid.

Sources:

George Ormerod, The History of the County Palatine and City of Chester, vol. 2 (second edition, revised and enlarged by T. Helsby, London, 1882).

TNA: PROB 11/40/343

‘Townships: Worsley’, in A History of the County of Lancaster: Volume 4, ed. William Farrer and J Brownbill (London, 1911), pp. 376-392. British History Online http://www.british-history.ac.uk/vch/lancs/vol4/pp376-392 [accessed 28 November 2022].

Causes

EDC 5/2/1 – plaintiff
EDC 5/3/1 – plaintiff
EDC 5/3/2 – plaintiff – exceptions against one witness included the fact that he was looking after one of Sir Richard Brereton’s illegitimate children

Sex

Male

Parish

Tilston

Marital Status

Unknown

Occupation Status

Gentleman

Remarks

There were a number of Cheshire families with the surname ‘Brereton’ at this time, including one influential family who lived in Malpas, not far from Tilston. This family included the courtiers, Sir Randle Brereton and his sons, Urian and William. William had been executed by Henry VIII, accused of adultery with Anne Boleyn.

It is possible that John Brereton was a family connection of theirs.

Causes

EDC 5/1582/11 – defendant

Sex

Male

Marital Status

Unknown

Remarks

Although Benedict Barker’s parish is unusually not given in the libel, the cause at EDC 5/1/8 concerns the tithes of Over and it may be that he lived in the area of the parish of Whitegate of which the parochial status was in dispute at that time.

Causes

EDC 5/1/8 – defendant

Sex

Female

Parish

Aldford

Marital Status

Married

Causes

EDC 5/1580/8 – defendant

Sex

Female

Parish

Chester, St Bridget

Marital Status

At Issue

Causes

EDC 5/1580/7– plaintiff

Sex

Male

Parish

Chester, St Oswald

Marital Status

Unmarried

Occupation Status

Swordbearer

Remarks

The swordbearer was a salaried official and one of the principal officers of the mayor of Chester.  He also received some income from tolls.

Causes

EDC 5/1580/5 – plaintiff in Banester c Urmeston
– defendant in Urmeston c Banester